Attention! This post contains a spoiler for a TargetMonkey target.
When I didn’t yet know the object of this sample session, I originally wanted to title my post “Just for fun.”
Later, after I learned what the target actually was, I changed my mind. It all began as a simple early morning practice session.
Let’s see the circumstances.
I requested a random target from (the onetime) TargetMonkey, but I didn’t open the file before completing the task. That’s why I didn’t include further details from the tasking line — “Describe the event as it unfolds in detail” — which, as it turns out, appears at the beginning of the feedback document. (That document also contains the tasking line itself.)
Without knowing the tasking, it was simply a “describe the target” session for me.
Did I describe it corretly?
(Note: I’m not a drawing artist!)
Target: 7771-9996
Viewer: BZ
Start time: 4 April 2013, 5:20 a.m.
Ideogram:
A specific part of the ideogram is at the centre (inside the square).
The square mark is only for emphasis — it was not part of the original ideogram.
Session Summary
Artificial object, not on its usual surface.
Monotone image, terrain-like, with many repeating elements.
Most characteristic features of the target (image):
Dynamism, elan or impetus — generated by a machine.
Vertical movement — both upward and downward.
Warm air rising.
Hot object in very cold conditions (AOL: “cold sea”).
Tiny toggling particles.
Artificial cold or freezing.
Fragments/flakes of frozen water.
Strong temperature difference.
Possible chemical reaction.
Environment: many small, pyramid-like natural formations arranged in dense rows.
Session end: 5:52 a.m.
Result of the viewing:
(Remember: I’m not a drawing artist!)
The target was:
